Welcome to J.A. Rock's Author Blog

Writing. Tea-Drinking. BDSM.

Thursday, May 23, 2013

Sequelpalooza: Which Wacky Wednesday Characters are Coming Back for More in The Brat-tastic Jayk Parker?

The cover is here. Look!


Beautiful work from Fiona Jayde. And I get another falling-down Y! Blurb time?

A year after the body swap that let brat Jayk and his dom, Amon, experience each other’s lives for a day, the pair is ready to be married in a small, stress-free ceremony. Things are going smoothly until they meet Jennifer and Ron Gaines-Brake—a quarrelsome couple with a laundry list of troubles whose wedding is at the same venue. When Jayk and Amon are drawn into the other couple’s drama, their own doubts and fears about marriage start to surface. And when they accidentally switch bodies with Jennifer and Ron the day before the wedding, their simple, stress-free celebration starts looking more and more like a nightmare.

As the couples attempt to deal with each other’s families, secrets, and last minute wedding preparations, things spiral out of control. Add to the mix a missing cat, a vigilant police officer, an intimidating dildo, and a cake like no other, and it’s anybody’s guess whether the weekend will end in bells or bedlam.


BTJP will be out June 4th from Loose Id, which is less than two weeks away, which I feel totally calm about.

The Brat-tastic Jayk Parker is the first sequel I've written. It’s a follow up to Wacky Wednesday, which was about a miscommunicating D/s couple who switch bodies for a day. Writing BTJP was quite fun, because the world was already there, I already knew the characters, and Jayk and Amon were 116% on board with the idea of relaying the next chapter in their lives. But it was at times a bit of a challenge to decide which side characters got to come back, and who had to be sent packing.

Who’s In

-Beth, Connor, and Stephanie. Jayk’s best friends and Beth’s yoga-loving girlfriend were at each other's throats for most of WW. Getting along much more harmoniously now, the three return in BTJP to throw Jayk his wedding shower, plan his bachelor party, and help dec the hall.

-Luciana Diamente. Top domme in town and organizer of extravagant BDSM parties, she threw a gala to remember in WW. Here she just has a cameo, but would it really be a wedding without her and her crab rangoon?

-Alex and Mr. Steve. This D/s couple were bit players in the first book, but in BTJP Alex is the procurer of a bizarre dildo that ultimately gets more page time than he does.

-Allen Ginspurr. I promised J&A’s cat a bigger role if there was ever a sequel. He is a more significant character in BTJP—unfortunately, significant mostly by virtue of his absence.

Who’s Out

-Bernard Witmeyer. Amon’s top pick for a job at his firm in WW and Jayk’s archnemesis. It pained me to turn down a Witty cameo, since he is so skilled at antagonizing Jayk. But there was no room for the World’s Most Qualified—and Douchiest—HR Candidate in a wedding story. Maybe next time.

-Coworkers. Amon’s coworkers are reduced to passing mentions, except for Carol Blean, who gets to have a little fun. And Jayk's days at the community college library are over, so goodbye to Carrie and Grogasshole.

Who’s New

-Ron and Jennifer Gaines-Brake. Jayk doesn’t need Witmeyer to make his life hell in BTJP. He’s got his hands full with this pre-hyphenated couple, who are getting married the day after Jayk and Amon at the same venue. Jayk is particularly offended by the complete mess they make of loving each other, and by Ron’s polo shirts.

-Amon’s parents. The Montereys show up to take Jayk and Amon to dinner—and to inadvertently make Jayk and Amon feel awkward about their wedding.

-Johnny Brake, Pet Detective. I’m not even going to say anything.

-Officer Gudd. A local police officer obsessed with catching the elusive Hancock Hills Hose-Splitter. Who may or may not be Amon, as far as Gudd’s concerned.

More to come on the BTJP front. BTJP will also be featured on the Big Gay Wedding Tour, a collection of m/m Loose Id authors who have wedding-themed books coming out in June. Stay tuned.

Thursday, May 16, 2013

I'm a Real Woman (and I Eat Real Food): Hop Against Homophobia and Transphobia 2013

"People who are reactionary try to keep the world from changing, rather than do the hard, but ultimately more realistic work of changing themselves." --Kate Bornstein, Hello Cruel World.


Hi, hoppers! Thanks for stopping by. The Hop Against Homophobia was one of my favorite events I participated in last year, and I'm thrilled to be part of this year's Hop Against Homophobia and Transphobia.

Today, May 17th, is the International Day Against Homophobia and Transphobia. Check out the webpage for more info. Also, here's a link to the Hop's main page, from which you can reach the blogs of the nearly 200 participating authors, publishers, reviewers, and cover designers of LGBTQ fiction.

If you leave a comment with your e-mail on this post, you're automatically entered in a drawing to win a copy of any of my backlist titles (more info about each on the sidebar), plus a $10 Amazon GC. So please, speak your mind.

During last year's hop, I looked at the subtle ways society lets LGBTQ people know that things would be a little better if we were straight. This year I'd like to talk a bit about that again, but also about how we view gender, especially in conjunction with sexual orientation.

I cook and bake a lot of vegan things for my friends and family. One thing I hear a lot is “You can’t even tell it’s vegan.” It’s meant as a compliment: I expected vegan food to be bland or full of lawn clippings or uncooked barley or something—but this actually tastes good.

“This tastes just like real food,” is another one. Which is amusing, because with some exceptions (I’m looking at you, Oreos) most vegan food is more “real” than say, hot dogs, or Easy Mac. But I know what people mean. The entire vegan/vegetarian marketing platform involves packaging veg food as something recognizable, familiar. Seitan becomes "Chik'n Strips," tofu becomes "tofu ribs," and so on.

The norm is our society's home base, its comfort zone, it's starting point, and anything that deviates from it gets assessed in terms of how close it comes to passing for normal.

A lot of times, I can taste the difference between vegan food and “regular” food. And I like the difference. It's why my two-month vegan challenge back in 2009 turned into four years of veganhood. I don’t mind if you can tell my stuff’s vegan. It is vegan. And it’s delicious.*

I was thinking about this in connection with the few times I’ve heard—directed at myself or at others and meant as a compliment—some variation on I can’t even tell you’re gay/lesbian/bi/trans, etc. I've even done it too, for friends who didn't want to be outed when we were younger: I can't even tell.

It seems like it's still considered a positive thing if LGBTQ people can pass as "normal." For those who fear losing a job or the love and support of friends and family if they come out, maybe "I can’t even tell" is a relief to hear. After all, we’re supposed to be able to identify people who don't fit the sexual norm based on their appearance and mannerisms, right? Remember the show Gay, Straight, or Taken? Yeah. Wow.

My mother, who I feel like I only mention on this blog when I’m talking about things parents say to kids that send mixed messages, which is unfair, since my mother is exceptional and 99% of everything she has ever said about me being queer, BDSM oriented, an erotica writer, and shamelessly obsessed with the Lord of the Rings trilogy has been exactly what I needed to hear,** told me when I came out, “Well, I think you look very feminine.”

I think when people say things like this, it’s not necessarily their own prejudices or stereotyping tendencies coming through. It might be a reaction to prejudices at work in society. In other words, it’s not I thought all lesbians had short hair and wore lumberjack shirts or I thought all gay guys loved fashion, or I thought all bisexuals were sex-crazed, but rather, I recognize this is a stereotype held by a lot of people in our society, and I just want you to know I don't think you fit that stereotype—in case you were worried about that.

It's a reassurance offered with the best of intentions, but the fact that it is offered as reassurance is a little troubling--as though every LGBTQ person's default state should be a fear of being called out on their sexual orientation because of deviation from traditional gendered behavior or appearance. Don't worry--you look like a real woman or a real man, even though you're something real women or real men aren't supposed to be.

There are really two issues here: the misinformed linking of sexual orientation and gender, and the assumption that LGBTQ people want to pass as members of the current sexual norm (as opposed to redefining it, doing away with it, or existing proudly outside of it). And that the way to do that is to dig a trench firmly on our assigned side of the gender binary.

I think we need to be cautious about when and why we praise adherence to traditional models of what's feminine and masculine. Not everyone is or wants to be one or the other. Our definitions of masculinity and femininity are outdated and limiting, and when we use the gender binary to create LGBTQ stereotypes, we open the door to potentially damaging messages: Don’t worry, you look so feminine/masculine no one will be able to tell you’re not normal. Or maybe if you looked/dressed/acted a little more like your ascribed gender, people would make fun of you less.

Once, a guy I’d just declined to go out with asked if I was a lesbian.

“Bi,” I told him.

“I could tell,” he said--not nicely.

That's still what some people reach for when they need an insult: you seem gay or I can tell you're gay. You're not a real man; you're not a real woman.

I'm happy to see traditional ideas about gender gradually turned on their heads, and to see an increased understanding that while we sometimes incorporate those traditional models into our identities by either embracing or rejecting them, the way we "do" gender isn't necessarily linked to our sexual orientation. But sometimes it is, and that's okay. It's not a compliment to be told I can pass for straight any more than it's an insult to be told it’s obvious I’m not.

We like to put people in boxes. I need to be able to tell at first glance that you’re a woman or a man or a woman dressed as a man or vice versa or gay or straight or bi or trans…

How about this? If you can’t tell, fine. Though hopefully it’s not because I feel I have to put on an act so you won’t be able to tell. And no need to high-five me about it.

If you can tell, fine. And don’t think it’s a) an insult to me or b) something you have to apologize for noticing.

My vegan cakes taste different from a cake made with three eggs and half a stick of butter. They’re delicious.

And they’re still cake.



*Except for that cucumber avocado soup. I don’t know what to say to the people who ate that except…I’m sorry.

**When you have a mother who says she saw some riding crops on sale and wonders if you want her to pick you up one, you lose your right to complain about anything else she says. Ever.



Thanks again for stopping by, and don't forget to leave a comment with your e-mail address for your chance to win. Now go hop some more!

Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Pardon My Radio Silence While I Flee the Country

I wasn't kidding when I said I wanted to get out of Alabama. Far, far away from Alabama. No offense to anyone reading this who's from Alabama. Your state has some beautiful hiking trails. Your love of football, however, is a little overwhelming.

Anyway, my post-graduating plans seem to involve a lot of not being in America. In three days I'm leaving for Chile, where I'll be staying for just over a month. I'm told Valparaiso is "the San Francisco of South America." I hope that means lots of leather clubs and frotting. I'll come back for a little bit to take care of some bridesmaiding and Authors After Darking (anyone else going? So excited!) And then in September I fulfill a long time dream when I go to...

wait for it...

NEW ZEALAND.

Where I'm going to try my hand at farming. Shouldn't be too hard, right? Me, some goats, some vegetables, some tractors. What could possibly go wrong?

But I'll still be writing everywhere I go, and once I get settled in Chile, you'll start hearing more about The Brat-tastic Jayk Parker, which is now less than a month away (June 4)! There's gonna some happenings this month on this blog, including BTJP excerpts, a special wedding edition of Allen Ginspurr's Meowdern Love advice column, the awesome Hop Against Homophobia and Transphobia (May 17-27), and the possible return of my mother. To this blog, I mean. She didn't leave in real life or anything.

Plus, in a couple of weeks, you can start following the Big Gay Wedding Tour, starring the LI m/m authors who have wedding books coming out in June.

Stay tuned. I have to go find my passport. Because honestly, I am not 100% sure where it is.

Thursday, May 2, 2013

The Naughty Boy is here! (and FREE)

Wow, so much has happened in the last few days. I failed miserably in my quest to become King of the Log, I finally graduated and left Alabama behind forever (though I'm still a little wary of saying that. I mean, Katniss thought she was done in the arena after the first Hunger Games, right?), and The Naughty Boy was just released! TNB is part of Loose Id's Spring Fling. It's a short companion piece to The Good Boy and tells the story of Brin dressing Lane for Lane's first date with Derek from Brin's POV.

If you've read TGB, you probably remember Brin. Super bratty, ultra-fabulous, the perfect counter to laidback Dom Ferg? Well now he's got his own story. It's available for free on the Loose Id site until May 8th, after which time it will be on sale for $1.99. And The Good Boy is on sale for a reduced price at Loose Id this week too.

Brin and his Dom, Ferg, have enjoyed a fun, sexy domestic discipline relationship for years. Brin knows his role--flamboyant, fabulous brat--and Ferg knows it's his job to play the big bad Dom, giving Brin the punishment he desperately craves. When Brin is tasked with dressing his new friend Lane Moredock for a date with Brin's ex, Derek, he's excited--fashion is what he knows best, and Lane is going to look stunning. But what should be a fun afternoon takes a serious turn when Brin sees that Lane has been injured, and Lane's reluctance to tell Brin the truth about it makes Brin start to question who he is, why things didn't work with Derek, and what people really think of him. Is he just a flittery, glittery fashion fairy? Or does he mean something more to the people he loves? And can he find a way to bring these doubts up with Ferg--or is Ferg going to have to Top his way to the bottom of this?




Friday, April 26, 2013

Hear Ye! Send Thy Prayers With Me Tomorrow

Studenting and sex writing is a lot of work. But even I know when it's time to take a break.

For the Georgia Renaissance Festival. My favorite excuse ever to wear costumes and drink mead. Not that I've ever needed an excuse.

That's where I'm going tomorrow, to celebrate graduating, life, and friendship through a slapdash, anachronistic recreation of an era in history that I'm pretty sure did not actually feature deep fried pickles.

But I need your help.

Two years ago, I attended Georgia RenFest with some classmates and faced a dastardly rival at the King of the Log competition. For those of you who don't know, King of the Log is when two people get on a log and try to knock each other off using giant bags of stuffing. Best 3 rounds out of 5 is the winner. It's serious business.

The score was 2 to 2 that fateful day in May 2011. My rival--let's call her BW--and I stood face to face, sacks in hand, preparing for the final round. The whistle blew, or the trumpet, I don't remember. I don't want to get into details. It will suffice to say that my foot slipped, and I fell off the log. I also lost my cell phone and a kindly fairy returned it.

Ballet flats are not the proper footwear for King of the Log.

Me, left, fighting the fearsome BW while some weird pirate watches.

So tomorrow, BW and I will meet on the log once more. This time, I shan't lose. And I'll wear my Nikes.

I'd like to say I've been training, but I really kind of only remembered to start training yesterday.

If you could send good wishes my way tomorrow, it would be much appreciated.

There can be only one King of the Log. And I mean to take the crown that should have been mine two years ago.

To glory!

Saturday, April 20, 2013

You Guys Shouldn't Have...pics from the TGB release party

Fact: I get really stressed out about book releases. I'll be excited for weeks beforehand. Then the night of the release, suddenly this book that I've been working on for months and couldn't wait to share with the world seems like a really bad idea. Is it too late to pull it? No? Okay. Then I'm just gonna sit here and drink boxed wine and wish I was a better writer and a better person. And better at dancing.

So I promised a shout out on this blog to the classmates who made The Good Boy's release a good time by throwing a party that I suspect may just have been an excuse to eat fruit tarts and drink. But hey, I can't think of a better way to spend a release night than that.

The best part of the party, aside from the crust on that blueberry tart (SERIOUSLY IT WAS SO GOOD.) was the artwork that adorned the walls of the host's home. I had no idea I was friends with so many artists. I'd like to share some of the highlights from what was a rather extensive gallery.



Using the website Mormon Missionary Positions as inspiration, Artist #1 created a collection of elaborately entangled stick figures entitled The Partner Yoga series.




Artist #2 took a more naturalistic approach to gay sex. I can't stop checking out the guy's ass in that first drawing.


Artist #3 worked more in the abstract, creating bizarre and magical images such as the Penis Train, the Penis Slug, and, of course, Caped Penis.




There were no boobs allowed at this penis party. (This is gonna come back to bite me in the feminist ass, isn't it?)



Partner Yoga became increasingly elaborate and involved props.


I learned things I never knew I never knew from this anatomically correct drawing.


At the end of the night I was given this eggplant because it was phallic.

I only regret that I couldn't feature all of the drawings here on this blog. Thanks again to the artists/bakers/wine pourers who contributed to the night's festivities.

Can we do this again?

Monday, April 8, 2013

Kay Berrisford's Back with Moggies, Robin Hood, and a Giveaway!

I am so pleased to welcome back to the blog the very awesome, very patient, very historically-fantastic and kinkeriffic Kay Berrisford! Kay put up with my questions about being British and writing ye olde BDSMe a few months back. She also recently put up with Lisa Henry’s and my shenanigans on her blog. So this time I owe her a rich, thought-provoking interview in which she doesn’t have to worry about being hounded for advice on how I can be more British, or being asked to school me in the ways of history…

And maybe I don’t exactly deliver.

But Kay always elevates my silly questions with her intelligent and entertaining answers. She’s the author of Bound for the Forest, Bound to the Beast, Catching Kit, Simon, Sex, and the Solstice Stone, Lord of the Forest (out April 9th!), which I am so excited for, and a freebie short out soon, Prisoner of the Mountain Watch. And she's got a GIVEAWAY for you (details below). Please join me in welcoming back Kay Berrisford!

1.     Tell us about Lord of the Forest!

Lord of the Forest – out tomorrow! – is my m/m retelling of the Robin Hood legend, with lots of m/m sexing and a dose of kink. My Robin’s a lone warrior, on the run from the law, who bands up with Cal (a brattish and totally untrustworthy royal spy), Herne the Hunter, and various others, to do the Robin Hood thing and save England from the clutches of the evil barons. Of course, along the way, he finds love in the most unlikely of places…

Lord of the Forest was a joy to write, and I’m hugely excited about it (if a little nervous.)  It’s very different
from most of the recent movies, that’s for sure. For some reason I was too terrified to watch any Robin Hood films or TV shows when I was writing it, instead comforting myself with fifteenth and sixteenth century ballads. I took them as my inspiration as well. Um, I’m a bit weird like that.

I was going to say that Lord of the Forest has a bit less kink than the rest of the Greenwood series, because being set in medieval times with real castles and dungeons and all the associated whump, meant my guys weren’t much into tying each other up for fun.  That said, I managed to get in, among other things, an accidental variant on tentacle porn, and a short,  not-quite-domestic-discipline scene, which was added to the story after a chat with, er, J.A.Rock no less!!!

Anyway, here’s the blurb…

Lord of the Forest (The Greenwood.)

England, 1217. Dark forces are rising. In the Greenwood, foul spirits grow powerful, and greedy barons plunder the lands. Only one man dares fight back—Robin Hood.
Robin’s band of brothers is broken. Now a lone warrior, he denies his famous name and laments the friends and lovers he’s lost. When the fair folk capture Cal, a beautiful young forester descended from the Greenwood’s ancient protectors, Robin rescues him and forges a new alliance.

Despite a sizzling attraction, Robin senses Cal isn’t like his old comrades, and he’s right. Cal’s been raised as a royal spy. He plans to seduce and betray Robin, but can’t harm the man he’s falling hard for. Mistrust and arguments spill into passionate lovemaking, as Cal learns the meaning of loyalty, fighting beside Robin, the only friend he’s ever known. Even the enchanted forest seeks to bind Robin and the returned protector ever tighter.

Their connection will be tested by nature’s wildest forces, Robin’s past, Cal’s lies, and in a baron’s darkest dungeon. To survive, Robin and Cal must admit their love and embrace their true destinies. Only then can they save England and each other—and win their happiness ever after.

The Greenwood series can be read in any order. If anyone needs a refresher or a quick-glance guide to the universe, check out my A to Z of the Greenwood here:

Sounds awesome! I wish everyone would heed my advice and add discipline scenes to their work. I’m only trying to help.

2.     I was re-watching one of my favorite movies the other day, The Last Unicorn, (because I’m an adult)—and the Greenwood was mentioned! I didn’t know what this meant as a kid, but thanks to you, I’m all over it now. Where else might the Greenwood have popped up in my day to day existence without me realizing it?

The greenwood is cool because everyone kind of knows what you’re getting at, even if you’re not all thinking about exactly the same thing. In English mythology (though there are variants in other northern European cultures and beyond) the greenwood conjures romantic images of the land before industrialization and modernity—of untamed sprawling woodlands, rich with mystery and magic, and populated (conveniently for me) by folk like Herne the Hunter, Robin Hood, and druids. English greenwood lore can be fairly clean and innocent, not to mention patriotic and sometimes a tad royalist. Though we do have our quotient of bloodthirsty fairy tales, I imported some of the darker elements of my Greenwood from the much gorier Germanic forest lore.

Where have you heard about it before? Well, plenty of fantasy writers use it, including Tolkien. Mirkwood was the Greenwood, before the nastiness associated with the return of Saurun set in. Another example, which I’ve blogged about elsewhere—E.M.Forster refers to it in his novel, “Maurice” (written in 1913-14). The tortured hero, unable to live openly as a homosexual, turns to the greenwood as the imaginative space in which he and his male lover can exist unfettered, in stark contrast to the homophobic reality in which he struggles to survive.

That’s another cool and liberating element of the greenwood—it exists outside modern laws, including the sexual ones.  That’s why literary lovers have long escaped to the forest realm, as in Midsummer Night’s Dream, of course!

My Robin hails from Sherwood—and was born in Inglewood, in Yorkshire, where some of the earliest mentions of Robin hail from—but the bulk of Lord of the Forest is set in the Greenwood. My Greenwood is roughly based on the New Forest and its myths and legends (which I waffled on about in my last interview here!!) My version is much larger and denser than the New Forest and has less caravans and tourists in it.

I love Maurice! I forgot about the Greenwood fantasies.

3.     Who is your most out-of control character? The one who just won’t listen when you tell him what you need him to do?
In the past, it was Herne the Hunter (who features in Lord of the Forest and Bound for the Forest as well as his own book, Bound to the Beast.) I had a hell of time getting a hold on his character, particularly when I wanted him to explain important plot points. He just wouldn’t. He’s a great, brooding ancient warrior, and words don’t come easily (er, unlike to me :P)  However, I think I’ve got a handle on him now, as we seemed to be a little bit more in tune when I was writing Locking Horns (my sequel to Bound to the Beast.) I just had Tam do all the talking.

4. I make fun of my Australian co-writer Lisa Henry a lot for spelling words like color, favorite, harbor etc. with a “U.” When the Brits do it, though, I admire it. I think I have it in my head that you guys did it first, and Australians are copycats. Can you confirm this for me, regardless of whether it’s true?

Of course it’s true.  Then again, I am a whinging pom.

I don’t know what that is, but I’m picturing a flying Pomeranian.

4.a. Teach me three new British words. Go:

          Moggy – cat. (as in, right now a great fluffy moggy is trying to walk across my keyboard.)
Don’t let the whinging pom get it!
          Puff – breath (as in, “I’m out of puff.”)
          Lurgy – minor illness/cold. Okay, I think I used this one in an email, but I’ve just had the lurgy again. Booo!!!

Edit: the Australians are copymoggies.

4.     One thing I love about books like Bound for the Forest and Simon, Sex, and the Solstice Stone is the way sex (or the suggestion of it) factors into ritual—and becomes a necessary means for the characters to achieve some larger goal. I recall from my Marion Zimmer Bradley days that sex often factored into pagan rituals. How do you see sex working in your historical fantasy books, was it really a big part of old-timey rituals, and why are we so prudish now? That was three questions. Sorry.

As far as my books concerned, if there’s going to be a ritual, my first thought is—hmmm, how kinky can I make it?  My second thought is—hmmm, but is that kinky enough?  How can I really make ’em squirm.

But there’s more to it than that. In erotic romance, sex is supposed to move the plot and the relationship between the main lovers on. Mixing sex with ritual pitches that onto a whole new level, heightening the process of transformation and connection both physically and supernaturally. So that’s fun.

Was it really a big part of old-timey rituals?  Well, that can be answered a million ways.  Sex has certainly long been an element of *fantasies* of pagan religious rituals, as featured in many a Victorian “penny dreadful.” As for the actual pre-historic religion that I took my inspiration from in the Greenwood novels, well, we don’t know a great deal about the substance of rituals. What we do know often comes from accounts written by the Romans, and they were keen to portray Ancient British and Germanic peoples as (pervy) savages anyway. However, we know for certain that sex and fertility rites were pretty damn central to prehistoric religion. The first of my books I opened to seek an example just now fell open on a picture of a female figurine sculpted in the shape of a phallus (dated from 5600-5300 BC.)  I rest my case.

5.     I’m lucky enough to have read the first three chapters of Lord of the Forest. I won’t ask you to for spoilers, much as I want to, but tell me about writing historical figures/legends. Is it hard to inhabit a character like Robin Hood, who’s already played a role in so many stories? Or does that just make it more fun? Did you feel any pressure to make your Robin fit with readers’ preconceived notions of that figure?

And thank you for reading :)

I didn’t have as much trouble as I did with Herne (see above.)  Knowing all those other stories about Robin made it easy to concoct his past and understand his background and values. After that, his character flowed relatively easily. To start off with, I was worried my Robin was a bit angsty, but to an extent, that was unavoidable given the stage of his life I decided to join him at. After over a decade as England’s outlaw hero, my Robin has left Sherwood after the death of his friend Friar Tuck. He’s not a damaged character as such (we’ve got Cal for that) but he’s somewhat weighed down by the weight of his fame and legend, which was an interesting element to play with. Plus, he’s never found his soul mate, of course…
Robin Hood's a total fox.


Do I feel pressure of people’s preconceptions? I’m bloody terrified! Maybe that’s why my Robin openly acknowledges the pressures of being Robin Hood, the most famous man in England. As I said before, I tried to make my story different from the recent movies and TV, but I’m hoping my Robin is still recognizably Robin. He’s involved in plenty of swashbuckling action. There’s castles, dungeons, torturers, and nasty barons, as well as the stuff you’d expect if you’ve read my other Greenwood books—fairies, kink, walking trees, more kink, foliage kink, and folk on quests to find the truth of their mysterious origins.

I love all of those things. Especially foliage kink.


Improve My Historical Accuracy

I am not a history major. You are. I use vague terms when I’m talking about historical eras or events to cover my lack of knowledge. I’m going to provide you with a list of terms I use and what I mean by them. Will you please tell me why I’m wrong/what I could do better? Maybe throw me some new terms I could use to impress people in future conversations?

Term: Old-timey. Example: Sex factored into a lot of old-timey rituals.

What I mean: Any point in history prior to 1990.

How could I improve?
Old-timey is a bit like the Greenwood, isn’t it? It evokes a fantastical image of ye olde worlde, though trouble is, you can’t be sure that the person who you’re communicating with has the same image. As long as you don’t mind that you might be referring to Ancient Rome and the person you’re speaking to has images of Anne Boleyn and Henry VIII in flagrante delicto, ’tis all good. So, um, you could be a bit more specific, but it’s all happy really.

Term: Victorian. Example: I love the elegant costumes and restrictive societal values of the Victorian era.

What I mean: Any era where women wore corsets and men had sideburns.

How could I improve?
So, the reign of Victoria (1837-1901—no, I didn’t wiki it, because I’m sad like that :P). Not to be confused with the splurge of decades before it, which people describe as Regency. The Regency, strictly speaking, is the relatively short period between 1811 and 1820, when George, the Prince Regent, ruled in proxy to his father, George III, before becoming George IV, but in romance terms seems to refer to books set between circa.1760 and the start of Victoria’s reign.

To be honest, you don’t really need to better this, just check up on dates and details, and try not to confuse too much with Regency, or people will start to slash Sherlock Holmes with Mr. Darcy.
Oh, and this *all* only works for British (and possibly British Imperial) history…

Term: Ancient Greece. Example: Cicero was one of the most important people in Ancient Greece.

What I mean: Ancient Greece or Rome. I can’t tell the white drapey cloth societies apart.

How could I improve?
Hmmm, I’m trying to think of a witty way to draw parallels between Regency/Victorian and Greek/Rome. I’m somewhat failing, apart from those are two overlapping corset!worlds and these are two overlapping white drapey cloth!worlds (Or, as I personally prefer to think of the latter, men-in-leather-miniskirt!worlds.)  So, the Greeks peaked a bit sooner, as it were, and then the Roman’s nicked all their best stories, column designs, and gods, and were a lot better at admin. And the Romans all copied Alexander the Great’s hair. There’s a longer version of that answer, but I think that covers the important tuff.

Term: Postmodern
I never use it; I just want you to tell me what it means.

Hmmm. Depends.  Historically, it can mean the current period, which is of course, after the “modern” period, which in some timelines can from the end of the medieval period (fifteenth century-ish) onward.  When the modern period became the postmodern period, is also debatable. And it seems a shame nobody could think of a new word. I mean, the medievals got medieval, right (which sounds vaguely kinky. Hurrah!)
Postmodern is also that deconstruction-y fun with texts, about arguing how nothing has a fixed meaning, and pictures of floating blobs, and, err… I’ll shut up now.

Please don’t tell my school I had to ask you that. They’re about to give me a Master’s in English.

6.     Are there any WIPs you want to tell us about? Maybe any that involve librarian warriors training bratty palace slaves? (You are going to rue the day you dropped a hint about that one. ’Cause I’m not going to let it go.)

Haha, oh yes, I have plenty.  Before I forget, I do have a free read coming out the week after next, Prisoner of the Mountain Watch, which is my first foray into all out fantasy, though there’s quite a bit of that on the WIP list..


Anyway, I promised you a list, so here’s a quick overview.

1.     Locking Horns – this is a Greenwood novella, and a sequel to Bound to the Beast. It’s not like the other novels, in that the main characters are not new. We’re revisiting Herne the Hunter, and his lover Tam. Because it’s set in 1804 (Herne and Tam are immortal) it also serves as a prequel to Bound for the Forest, and we get to meet some of the characters from that book too.  It’s a standalone little story in its own right, and features, er, Maypole kink. This is likely to be the next thing out.

2.     Dark Towers – a working title I have for a medieval-style fantasy story that I’m about to start finishing.  Honest. This one’s quite dark—but it’s going to end up fluffy.

3.     Sci-fi prison shifter story.  I’m quite excited about this…

4.     Victorian theatre kink. With canes and corsets. I started this two years ago now, so it’s been on the WIP pile for ages. But it needs to come off.  Soon.

5.     The other, much sillier medieval-style fantasy, about the warrior-come-librarian training the very crap sex slave. Also needs to be finished. Soon!

6.     Greenwood #4 – the fourth full-length Greenwood novel.  Will be set in the English Iron Age (before the Roman invasion) and explain how all the spirits came to be bound to the forest. There will be lots of ritual and blood sacrifice in this one. Just because.  Also, I have an idea for a Greenwood Xmas story set in WW2.

These won’t all get finished this year, but will do soon, I hope!

Ohhh my god, theater kink! Bad slaves! Sci fi shifters! Are you sure you can’t finish it all this year?

Thank you so much for coming by, Kay.  I feel significantly smarter now. Wishing you a huge success with this book! It sounds wonderful.

Thank you for having me! It’s been great fun, and sorry about all the waffle!!!!

I love waffles. One time in Spain I ate one with chocolate sauce and when I was done I licked the container in front of a bus full of people and they judged me.

Here's a li'l blurb for "Prisoner of the Mountain Watch," available for free April 15th:

Once a great warrior, Ivenhal now leads a lonely existence, banished by his people because he’s lain with other men. When he captures an enemy elf, his life takes an unexpected turn.

...and here are Kay's giveaway details!

If you’d like a chance to WIN your choice of Bound for the Forest or Bound to the Beast, in your choice of paperback or ebook—PLUS a $20 Loose Id or All Romance voucher—all you need to do is leave a comment here or at any of my stops on my Lord of the Forest blog tour. You can enter the draw as many times as you like at the different blogs I visit on my tour - scehdule ishere. (URL- http://kayberrisford.com/2013/03/29/lord-of-the-forest-blog-tour-grand-announcement-win-a-copy-and-loads-of-prizes/)  There will be more chances to enter here at my blog over the next couple of weeks, or if you’re uncomfotable posting your email anywhere, you can email me at kayberrisford@yahoo.co.uk. You will be entered :)   Two runners up prizes will be a choice of any of my back catalogue titles in ebook format, excluding Lord of the Forest. Draw closes 4/12/13.